PRAYOGX
ADV-2026-P2-CHE-Q09

The sugar lab: oxidise, reduce, hydrolyse and measure — four statements, four benches

JEE Advanced 2026 Paper 2 Chemistry Q.9 · Section 2 Biomolecules Optical rotation
Answer
Run the experiment
Run all four benches to unlock.
Mission. Four statements have walked into the sugar lab and only some of them survive contact with an experiment. Collect the evidence bench by bench.
0 / 4 benches

01Original question — verbatim

The correct statement(s) regarding sugars is(are)
Given: Specific rotations of L-(−)-glucose and L-(+)-fructose are −52.5° and +92.5°, respectively.
  • (A)
    On treatment with HNO3, gluconic acid is oxidized to saccharic acid, whereas glucose is not oxidized to saccharic acid.
  • (B)
    Fructose gives a positive Fehling's test because it isomerises to glucose and another aldohexose in the presence of Fehling's reagent.
  • (C)
    Invert sugar is an equimolar mixture of D-glucose and D-fructose formed after hydrolysis of the corresponding disaccharide.
  • (D)
    Specific rotation of invert sugar is −40°.

Multiple options may be correct (+4 / partial / −1). Four statements, four benches. Predict first, then run the experiment — the verdicts below are computed from what you observe, not looked up.

02Bench A — the oxidation flask

Nitric acid is a strong oxidising agent: it attacks an aldehyde and a primary alcohol alike. Put something in the flask, look at which ends are oxidisable, and heat it.

Reagent shelf

Tap any group on the structure to find out what HNO3 does to it.

Predict, then run

Statement (A) says glucose is not oxidised to saccharic acid by HNO₃. Before you heat anything — is that right?
Commit to an answer, then run both experiments.

Products so far

Run HNO₃ on both glucose and gluconic acid, then compare the two products.
experimentally disproved

03Bench B — Fehling's test on a ketose

Fehling's reagent is alkaline, and that one word is the whole story. Run the test on a ketose that has no aldehyde group of its own and see what the copper does.

Test-tube station

Fehling's solution — deep blue Cu(II)
Cu oxidation state
+2
in the tube
reducing sugar
—
present?
result
—
Fehling's test

Predict, then run

Fructose is a ketose with no −CHO. Will it give a positive Fehling's test?
Commit to an answer, then heat the tube.

What the alkali does

Mechanism
Heat the tube and watch the copper.
experimentally confirmed

04Bench C — hydrolysing sucrose

Sucrose is one glucose and one fructose held together by a glycosidic bond. Break that bond and count what comes out — then watch the polarimeter needle change sides, which is where the name comes from.

Sucrose

Tap the bond in the middle, or either ring, to identify it.

Predict, then run

One molecule of sucrose is hydrolysed completely. What comes out?
Commit to an answer, then hydrolyse.

The balance

glucose
0
molecules
fructose
0
molecules
ratio
—
glucose : fructose
rotation
+66.5
degrees
Hydrolyse the sucrose and read the balance.
experimentally confirmed

05Bench D — the polarimeter

The paper gives you the L sugars. Invert sugar is made of the D ones. Sort that out first, then mix and measure — and watch what happens if you forget one step of the arithmetic.

Polarimeter

—observed specific rotation
Glucose and fructose are both C₆H₁₂O₆, so equal moles means equal mass and the mixture's rotation is the plain average of the two.

First: D or L?

D/L is configuration. (+)/(−) is which way the light turns. They are independent — that is the whole trap in this statement.

Use the printed L sugars
L-(−)-glucose −52.5 · L-(+)-fructose +92.5
Convert to the D sugars
D-(?)-glucose · D-(?)-fructose
Invert sugar is made of D-glucose and D-fructose. Which pair of numbers should go into the calculation?

Build the calculation

Tap a tile, then tap a slot. Get it right and the polarimeter locks in.

?+ ? ? = ?
Set the configuration, then build the average.
experimentally disproved

06Verdict on each statement

Every verdict below came out of a bench you ran. The traps are the wrong turns this question is built to catch — open one only after you have formed your own view.

Lab notebook

Written as you work. Only what you actually demonstrated appears here.

Nothing recorded yet — work through the four benches above.

Common traps

Predict, then check

07Step-by-step solution

The solution is still locked

Test all four statements on the bench above and the derivation opens by itself.
Statements tested: 0 of 4 — oxidise both compounds, run Fehling's on fructose, hydrolyse sucrose and finish the average

08Concepts and classification

Relations used

mild oxidation (Br2/H2O): CHO → COOH only ⟹ gluconic acid
strong oxidation (HNO3): CHO → COOH and CH2OH → COOH ⟹ saccharic acid
ketose + OH⁻ ⇌ 1,2-enediol ⇌ aldoses (Lobry de Bruyn–van Ekenstein)
RCHO + 2Cu²⁺ + 5OH⁻ ⟶ RCOO⁻ + Cu2O↓ + 3H2O
sucrose + H2O ⟶ D-glucose + D-fructose (1 : 1)
enantiomers: [α]D equal in size, opposite in sign
mixture: [α] = Σ (mass fraction × [α]i)
D / L is configuration · (+) / (−) is observed rotation · the two are independent

Classification

Simulation IDADV-2026-P2-CHE-Q09
Exam / Year / PaperJEE Advanced · 2026 · Paper 2
SubjectChemistry (Organic)
ChapterBiomolecules
TopicMonosaccharides, reducing sugars and optical rotation
SubtopicsMild versus strong oxidation of glucose · Lobry de Bruyn–van Ekenstein rearrangement · Fehling's test and reducing sugars · Hydrolysis of sucrose and invert sugar · Specific rotation of a mixture · D/L configuration versus (+)/(−) rotation
Question typeMultiple correct MCQ (+4 / partial / −1)
DifficultyModerate–Hard
Answer— run the experiment

Teacher notes

  • Objective. Separate three ideas students routinely fuse: what an oxidant attacks, what alkali does to a ketose, and what "specific rotation of a mixture" means.
  • Teaching order that works. Run bench D first in class — the −40 trap is the fastest way to get attention — then go back to A, B, C.
  • Expected wrong answers. Most students pick (A) and (C), or (B), (C) and (D). The (D) error is arithmetic, not chemical, so it survives a strong conceptual student.
  • Discussion question. "If invert sugar were equal masses instead of equal moles, would the answer change?" (Here no — identical molar masses. Ask them why that matters.)
  • Shortcut worth teaching. Any statement of the form "X is oxidised but Y is not" deserves a check of what oxidisable groups Y still has. Glucose has two.
  • Board demonstration. Fehling's on fructose is a real thirty-second demo and it lands hard — students expect nothing to happen.
YOU CRACKED
THE SUGAR LAB
Four benches run · four statements settled on evidence
(B) and (C)